At 01:02 PM 13/04/2014, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote: >Risks are one thing - happenings are another. >Without defending the article, what's new is the public's perception and >awareness of real events.
Agree. It's important when the stories jump from the tech pages to the front/social commentary pages. Lots of times we are just talking to ourselves about these things, unfortunately. It's not until issues get politically dangerous to the government or corporations' bottom lines that the mainstream start to get a bit uncomfortable under the collar, so it's good when the public does start to pay attention. Then again, this article is in a blog in an innovations section. I wouldn't bet on it getting a whole lot more notice than the usual tech pages. Also, on the topic itself, for those who do consider these aspects of making it less desirable to debate in a public internet because of possible backlash by an over reactive govt, it just means the whole thing will be even more fluff and cat pictures. Jan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [email protected] Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space. ~Margaret Atwood, writer _ __________________ _ _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
