On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:34 +1000, David Boxall wrote: > On 31/08/2015 10:39 PM, Andy Farkas wrote: > > I'm in rural Queensland. Fibre is not an option.
The idea that some places "just can't be reached by fibre" is just plain wrong. (I know you didn't say that Andy - your email was just the trigger for my rant :-) There is almost no place on earth that cannot be reached by fibre. It can certainly reach any spot that a human can reach, and many more besides. We have fibre running over mountains, THROUGH mountains, through forests, across the depths of the oceans, running thousands of kilometres underground and underwater, not to mention strung on poles here and there. About the only area where as far as I know there is no fibre is in the arctic and antarctic regions. Getting fibre to some places is more expensive than others, and some environments are more hostile to fibre than others, but there is literally NO technical impediment to connecting any square centimetre of Australia we like by fibre. Can we PLEASE stop assuming that the difficulties are technical? They are political, and only ever were. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: 3C41 82BE A9E7 99A1 B931 5AE7 7638 0147 2C3C 2AC4 Old fingerprint: EC67 61E2 C2F6 EB55 884B E129 072B 0AF0 72AA 9882 _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
