At 01:39 PM 27/06/2016, David Lochrin wrote:
>> For example, lots of small buses instead of fewer large ones.
>
>That's fine in principle, but I strongly suspect the optimum size of a bus is 
>determined by its service requirements, such as the number of people to be 
>moved between major centres at various times during the day together with the 
>economics of capital cost, garaging, parts & maintenance, staffing, etc.  
>There's no way we're going to triple the number of buses because of the 
>limitations of battery technology. 

These smaller buses would be terrific in narrow street neighbourhoods where the 
estates were designed with no room for bus traffic or streetside parking like 
mine. It would be especially useful for the elderly who can't walk to bus stops 
from these sorts of estates, especially in bad weather. For one thing it would 
alleviate parking congestion at stations as well. Run the buses more frequently 
with a smaller number of passengers in a small geographic footprint. I would 
love that.

Victoria is announcing a coordinated state transport commission/board/whatever 
today to try to break through the stove pipes of rail, road, public transport, 
shipping and freight. Imagine that!

Jan


I write books. http://janwhitaker.com/?page_id=8

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
[email protected]
Twitter: <https://twitter.com/JL_Whitaker>JL_Whitaker
Blog: www.janwhitaker.com 

Some psychopaths become serial killers, and other psychopaths become 
prosecutors. - Bob Ruff, Truth and Justice, June 2016

Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you 
fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space. 
~Margaret Atwood, writer 

_ __________________ _
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to