At 11:55 AM 13/02/2017, David Lochrin wrote:
>Given that we're dealing with broadband Back o' Bourke and not greater Sydney, 
>the cost of providing 10 Mbit/sec in remote areas is likely to be orders of 
>magnitude less than 1 Gbit/sec.  While I'm no fan of the current Government's 
>approach, all governments have to make package decisions - what is worth doing 
>within the country's economic constraints.
>
>So I suggest arguments about baandwidth in remote areas need to be properly 
>thought through in terms of utility and cost/benefit if they're to get a 
>hearing where it counts.

I don't disagree with any of that. We are an odd duck country, given the 
expanses of nothingness/sparseness of population. The Australian way, although 
probably always fought against by the 'haves' in the cities, was to try its 
best to subsidise through sharing to make sure those who chose to live in those 
sparse areas and provide FOOD to those living in the cities were shown they are 
valued as equal citizens. However now the equity issues are moving into 
extremes that challenge that provision of equity. One could say the same thing 
for health and education provision. There just isn't equity in either of those 
things for bush families in the immediacy we get in cities. So we have a lot of 
volunteer stuff happening, like Angel Flight (if you don't know about this, 
check it out - these people truly are human angels).

But I thought the overall 1Gb discussion wasn't about bush provision. So when 
that is taken out of the equation, the decision points change - drastically. 
And like so many other technologies, we can't discount that in the future even 
bushies will be able to get similar service through some technological 
development. So why not put it in place in the 'easy' places now so that the 
applications and spur to do the R&D happens?

We'll always hit up against physics and physical spaces. But it doesn't mean 
where those physical limits don't exist that the models can't be built to 
extend services to those in harder to serve areas through a minimum level of 
USO, even if that's not 1Gb (now).

Oh, one more thing. I think you're right, David Lochrin - the focus on the 
technology muddies things - a lot. But when you see the stupid stupid stupid 
promises from NBN to provide space engineering programs and NOT differentiating 
who will be able to access such programs, it gets a bit harder to trust them on 
anything much about content delivery. They gotta stop that.

I'm liking this debate, btw.

Jan



I write books. http://janwhitaker.com/?page_id=8

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
[email protected]
Twitter: <https://twitter.com/JL_Whitaker>JL_Whitaker
Blog: www.janwhitaker.com 

Some psychopaths become serial killers, and other psychopaths become 
prosecutors. - Bob Ruff, Truth and Justice, June 2016

Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you 
fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space. 
~Margaret Atwood, writer 

_ __________________ _
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to