On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 11:12 +1000, Jim Birch wrote: > "To avoid that risk, you might consider pointing out errors and > untruths specifically and explicitly." > > Sure: what are the specific actual harms that have occurred
That is not pointing out an error, that's asking a question. Not a bad question, just an irrelevant one. My concerns are valid even if there has been no harm done yet. "Look, a tidal wave! Run away!" "Nah, nothing's happened yet..." You have not yet provided a single actual counterargument. Just some reasons why you think My Health Record is a good thing, plus the odd insult. Once again: Did I make any untrue statements in my "letter to the paper"? If so, which ones and how are they untrue? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: A0CD 28F0 10BE FC21 C57C 67C1 19A6 83A4 9B0B 1D75 Old fingerprint: A52E F6B9 708B 51C4 85E6 1634 0571 ADF9 3C1C 6A3A _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
