Glen Turner wrote: > > I haven't gone through the examples offered. I am wary that the peer > reviewers of "Military Cyber Affairs" would be less able to review > the examples of BGP behaviour than the peer reviewers of SIGCOMM > "Computer Communications Review".
Tore Anderson examined one example and was not convinced: https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2018-November/097740.html > Anyway, in my opinion the data for this particular incident (I > haven't looked into the other three) does not indicate foul play on > CT's behalf, but rather a pretty standard leak by SKB followed by > sloppy filtering by CT and TC both. -glen _______________________________________________ Link mailing list Link@mailman.anu.edu.au http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
