On Monday, 5 August 2019 11:07:17 AEST Karl Auer wrote: >> This is a vastly different proposition to decoding thoughts. > > Well - yes and no. And you still need to decode the speech.
Interesting... I interpreted "decoding thoughts" as identifying a concept, or an intention, before it's resulted in motor activity such as verbalisation, activation of limb muscles, etc. But leaving aside the issue of sensors, would this require a processor having the same order of complexity as the human brain, especially if the whole brain is involved in creating that intention? Cheers, David L. _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
