On 4/1/20 11:36 am, JLWhitaker wrote:
On 4/01/2020 10:56 am, David wrote:
It's interesting to note the way PR companies succeeded in changing the language when awareness of GW began developing.  The original term was "greenhouse warming" which neatly incorporated the cause of the problem (accumulation of greenhouse gasses) and the effect (planetary warming).  PR first changed the language to "global warming" which got rid of the cause, then to "climate change" which leaves it all wide open; maybe the planet is cooling?

The radical honest media is now calling it global heating. I saw that first in The Guardian, but then noticed it in other publications as well, one or two. Heating is far more scary than warming, which is frog in the pot dangerous. Global Burning may be more appropriate now and might start to get attention.

Long, long time Anthropomorphic Global Overheating (Long, long time AGO)

Anthropomorphic Global Overheating Needs You (AGONY)

Anthropomorphic Global Overheating Needs Everyone's Resolve (A GONER)

Anthropomorphic but Avoidable Radical Global Heating  (AARGH!)


--
Roger Clarke                            mailto:[email protected]
T: +61 2 6288 6916   http://www.xamax.com.au  http://www.rogerclarke.com

Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA
Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law            University of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer Science    Australian National University
_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to