Too bad... Seems difficult to solve this problem that way. I don't think the gcc version can play a role. Do you think it can be possible for me log on your machine with ssh and try by myself ? I'd like to modify the code to add some printouts. Otherwise I'll send you modified versions and we can iterate together.
Simon Le samedi 27 juin 2009 14:14:38, Bent a écrit : > Simon, > > I have recompiled Linphone with these lines: > make clean > LDFLAGS=-g make > But the result is almost the same; there are slight differences in the > back-trace and an extra line: > Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?). > > I have been using a self-compiled version of Linphone all the time. I > checked the Makefile and it has these two lines (not at the same > spot): > CFLAGS = -g -O2 > LDFLAGS = > as you had mentioned. This made me try the exercise with the LDFLAGS= > > Could it be something with the version of gcc? I seem to remember from > the Ekiga list that the gcc version *could* play a role. My gcc is > 4.3.2 and the advice on the Ekiga list was to use either 4.4 or 4.2 > for reasons I can't remember. > > So: what do I best do now? > > Another observation, which I should have included in the very first > post: When I preload the compatibility library, it doesn't matter > which version of V4L I choose, both work equally well. The V4L2 > version should fail, shouldn't it? > > Kind regards, > > Bent _______________________________________________ Linphone-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
