That's the kernel you want then. If you were installing under VM, it would have been vmlinuz-2.4.9-17-rdr (or something like that). The "vmlinuz" name was around a long time before anyone in Linux land thought much about VM/ESA.
Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: Dave Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Redhat 2.4.9 IPL Problem WS 000A0000 0000000F In a message dated 1/17/2002 10:46:36 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > It looks > like vmlinuz-2.4.9-17-tape (which is your kernel) didn't get written to > /boot, so the zipl command failed. > That name (vmlinuz-2.4.9-17-tape) bothers me...I'm not installing under VM...but in an LPAR. Dave
