Sorry, Steve --

The one thing I *can* confirm is that we're *not* doing a 64-bit Linux
distro. The existing distributors certainly have that task well in hand.
The only reason I commented on it at all was that at least one previous
note in this thread had asked "what would ya ever need with a 64-bit Linux
besides gee-whiz value?". Sorry if I misled ... that was not my intent.

--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
+1 203 486-2835 (voice/fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



                      Steve Guthrie
                      <steve.guthrie@ma        To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      ntissa.com>              cc:
                      Sent by: Linux on        Subject:  Re: Why not IBM's Linux
                      390 Port
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      IST.EDU>


                      01/21/2002 16:50
                      Please respond to
                      steve.guthrie





Gee, Jim, have you been sued for accidental use of acronyms in email
messaging before?  I'll try to remember zseries (Is the S in caps?  Oh
well,
another lawsuit;)).

As far as the posted note contained herein, I wanted to indicate that IBM
was developing an internal system with a 64-bit port that wasn't one the
big
three distros.  I find that significant since IBM doesn't generally waste
development dollars on experimentation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim
Elliott
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why not IBM's Linux


> Roger. I do mean Z/Series, not Z/OS. As for IBM being "distro
> agnostic", what does this portend:

>> We use it for cross-development for a 64-bit target zSeries system,
>> whose nature I can't discuss yet (announcement pending, hopefully
>> within the next 6 months)

Steve:

To keep our trademarks straight, it is zSeries and z/OS (case and slash
sensitive). The hardware does not have a slasha and the software does,
and no, I don't know why.

As to the "distro agnostic", IBM has formal relationships with Red Hat,
SuSE and Turbolinux on zSeries. We do not express a preference. As to
Jim Tison's comments, he is in TPF development (one of the four
mainframe OSs you can buy from IBM). I can't say what he is working on,
but check out http://ibm.com/tpf for more info on that OS.

Regards, Jim Elliott - Linux Advocate, IBM Canada Ltd.

Reply via email to