Your
RX bytes:168 (168.0 b) TX bytes:496 (496.0 b)
are extremely low are you sure you are communicating over the hipersocket
connection and not backhauling through your ctc0?
We got bit by that earlier today. Fortunately we did not pop the cork on
the champagne :)
jrw
"Ferguson, Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on
01/30/2002 15:25:21
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: QETH/Hipersocket/Guest Lan.Save me from jumping o ff a bridge
Here's the ifconfig from a system with a working hipersocket connection:
hsi0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet addr:10.20.71.5 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/10 Scope:Link
UP RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:8192 Metric:1
RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:168 (168.0 b) TX bytes:496 (496.0 b)
Interrupt:5
Here's the routing:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
10.20.44.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 40 0 0
ctc0
10.20.71.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 40 0 0
hsi0
0.0.0.0 10.20.44.1 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0
ctc0
> -----Original Message-----
> Um,
>
> Not jumping off the bridge now.. because that fixed it but
> um, thats wrong
> isn't it??
>
> I mean our goal was to truly have a subnet inside VM.
>
> How will I be able to setup routing with a host type mask?
