Hi John,

On both RH 7.2 RC2 and SuSE 7.0 I get no errors doing this with a r/o /usr.

Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer 
Internal Revenue Service - Room�6030 
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 
Washington, D.C.� 20224 

Voice: (202)�927-4188�� FAX:� (202) 622-6726
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  



-----Original Message-----
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sharing the disk space


> Yes, there is, but you run into data integrity problems, and data
> synchronization problems.  If you make /usr read-only to all the systems
> sharing it, you can avoid both of those problems, until it comes time to
> add/change/remove something.  Then, you're looking at methods to
circumvent
> the problems that can cause, or re-booting all the systems at the same
time
> to pick up the changes.  (You may not need to reboot, but taking the
system
> down to single user mode so that the file system can be unmounted and
> re-mounted is as close as you can get without actually rebooting.)  One
> possibility would be to have multiple copies of /usr, and update the VM
> guest's CP directories to point to the most recent one so that when the
> system is shutdown, logged off, and back on again, it will pick up the new
> file system.  Unless you're talking about enough images being run that
DASD
> space is still conserved, it's kind of pointless.  I don't think three
> images would qualify for me to deal with that hassle.  NFS/GFS/XFS start
> looking a lot better at this point.

Could someone with /usr mounted ro try this?

mount /usr -o remount,ro

I think it will work;  if not it will fail gracefully.

I was going to boot the possum and try it, but I've taken to putting
everything into one partition these days.





--
Cheers
John Summerfield

Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/

Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my
disposition.

Reply via email to