This assumes that every Linux image is going to be using the same disk,
does it not?
|---------+---------------------------------->
| | Barton Robinson |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | FTWARE.COM> |
| | Sent by: Linux on 390 |
| | Port |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | U> |
| | |
| | |
| | 04/25/2002 09:48 AM |
| | Please respond to Linux|
| | on 390 Port |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: LinuxWorld Article series
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The author is correct. This has NOT been addressed for Linux
on zSeries.
>From: Werner Puschitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Is the author right on this:
>
>http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2002/0416.mainframelinux-p7.html
>"Linux memory management assumes control of a machine and so grabs up
>free memory for use in I/O buffering. Having multiple Linux instances do
>this to independently buffer I/O to the same files resident on a shared
>mini-disk not only wastes memory, but dramatically increases the paging
>effort."
>
>Or has this already been addressed for Linux on zSeries?
>
>Thanks
>Werner
"If you can't measure it, I'm Just NOT interested!"(tm)
/************************************************************/
Barton Robinson - CBW Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Velocity Software, Inc Mailing Address:
196-D Castro Street P.O. Box 390640
Mountain View, CA 94041 Mountain View, CA 94039-0640
VM Performance Hotline: 650-964-8867
Fax: 650-964-9012 Web Page: WWW.VELOCITY-SOFTWARE.COM
/************************************************************/
