Mark - thanks.  There was a collision with the iucv module with patch 7
which prompted my question.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead
Kaiser Permanente Information Technology
25 N. Via Monte Ave
Walnut Creek, Ca 94598

Phone:   (925) 926-5332 (tie line 8/473-5332)
E-Mail:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sametime: (use Lotus Notes address)
AIM:        lbdyck

Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/16/2002 01:55:06
PM:

> I would probably go for the April 15th one, but that may mean you'll
need to
> put on a bunch of other patches as well:
>
> linux-2.4.7.tar.gz (original kernel source)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390-1.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390-2.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390-3.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390-4.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390-5.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390-6-lcs.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-s390-7.diff (IBM)
>                      + linux-2.4.7-timer-4.diff (IBM)
>
> And there may be collisions with the SuSE source code patches that
they've
> put on the kernel already.
>
> Mark Post
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lionel Dyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Timer Patch
>
>
> I noticed that there are several releases of the timer patch at
>
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/current2_4_
> 7.shtml
>
> Given that I'm running the SLES 7 2.4.7 level kernel which one do I
want,
> or does it matter?
>
> thx
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead
> Kaiser Permanente Information Technology
> 25 N. Via Monte Ave
> Walnut Creek, Ca 94598
>
> Phone:   (925) 926-5332 (tie line 8/473-5332)
> E-Mail:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sametime: (use Lotus Notes address)
> AIM:        lbdyck

Reply via email to