Umm, no, they already have. Keeping the patches separate gives _you_ more control over what gets done to your software. Since these patches aren't rolled into the main kernel tree yet, you probably want to be a little selective about what you put on.
Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Code drop 2002-07-25 Thanks MARK, guess they need to get together their act........ Ken At 11:23 AM 7/26/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Ken, > >Typically, they are _not_ cumulative. > >Mark Post > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:32 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Code drop 2002-07-25 > > >Are these patches accumulative ?? do we need to apply ALL of them, or will >the latest ones do ? >Ken > > > > > >At 03:44 PM 7/26/2002 +0200, you wrote: > >Linux for zSeries & S/390: > > > >Please check out our DeveloperWorks page at: > > > >http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/whatsnew.s >html > > > >We are releasing binutils 2.11.90.0.27 recommended patch > >and gcc 2.95.3 recommended patch each for kernel 2.4.7 and 2.4.17. > > > > > >Happy downloading! > > > >********************************************************* end of message > > > > > >Mit freundlichem Gru� / Kind regards, > >Gerhard Hiller > > > >eServer Software Management, D4357, 06-018 > >IBM Development Lab, Boeblingen > >Phone ext. (+49) 7031 - 16 - 4388 > >Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
