If this is truely a sandbox system and you really don't give a big hoot about performance, this system will be great. We should all be so lucky! (are you listening Bob?)
On Friday 30 August 2002 09:18 am, you wrote: > I'm not up to speed on VM yet, so three followup questions: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >I would try not to have all the guests running simultaneously if at all > possible. Even if you do and can live with some zVM paging you should be just fine. > > 1. Will VM give me more flexibility when I carve up the real memory > to the individual guests (vs multiple lpars using dynamic storage > reconfiguration). > Can I add/delete real memory to guests on the fly? No, when the VM directory is changed the guest must be logged off and logged back on (which means reboot/reipl of the guest). > > 2. Same question for CP ? > > >Dedicate two of the adapters to Linux guests and use guest LANs to connect > >VM TCP and the z/OS systems > > 3. Are these two Linux guests suggested for the purpose of routing(to the > other guests) > DMZ, firewall, etc. as you have mentioned in the past? VM itself can perform the routing duties since it can also access the Guest LAN. VSE should have hipersockets support when 2.7 is released (which could be by the end of the year). -- Rich Smrcina Sytek Services, Inc. Milwaukee, WI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Catch the WAVV! Stay for Requirements and the Free for All! Update your S/390 skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price. WAVV 2003 in Winston-Salem, NC. April 25-29, 2003 For details see http://www.wavv.org
