On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:24:17AM -0500, Paul Raulerson wrote:
> Unless of course, they do a lot of bit manipulation, in which case that rotten Intel 
>Arch. is inverted and out of order...
> -Paul

There is a lot of bitmanipulating code in the common code of linux (look at select 
system-call)
which runs without modifications on architectures with different byte-order and
different word size.

-Ihno

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Boyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Intel Architecture Emulated with Linux/390?
>
>
> > > As I am investigating vendor support for Linux/390, I have run into a
> > > question I cannot answer.  Vendors want to know if Linux/390
> > > emulates Intel
> > > architecture.
> >
> > No, it does not.
> >
> > > Apparently, when programming in C, they have to
> > > write the
> > > application to the specific architecture and that it will not work on
> > > non-Intel based systems.
> >
> > If you're getting crap like this from your vendors, you need new vendors.
> >
> > Your vendors will have to recompile their applications for the appropriate
> > processor architecture, but if they're too clueless to be able to understand
> > this, I'd be pretty wary of them in the first place.
> >
> > -- db
> >

--
Ihno Krumreich            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux AG             S390 & zSeries
Deutschherrnstr. 15-19    +49-911-74053-439
90429 N|rnberg            http://www.suse.de

Reply via email to