> This question is causing alot of confusion for us.  We are
> getting ready
> to
> put up SuSe linux, and also want to put up a couple of relevent
> applications
> to actually do a pilot test.  When an vendor application says it is
> certified
> to run on SuSe(or Redhat) distribution, does that mean it is
> certified on
> run
> on that distribution regardless of the underlying hardware platform?

No. Unless the vendor explicitly says "X on System/390 or zSeries", you
can probably bet that it's for Intel only.

> However, we would also like to do INFORMIX, and there is a version for
> Linux(but not listed as z/Series ready).  Will this run on
> Linux on the
> mainframe?  Or is this another black-eye for the mainframe(like Unix
> System Services was from a pure UNIX perspective) where
> it's not quite ready for prime-time, and is just different enough that
> there
> are not enough apps available yet.

Vendors go where the volume is. There's more Intel boxes out there, so
those go first. Usually, you need to ask/pester/browbeat the vendor to
do a 390 release, but once they've done the Intel version, it's usually
a much less difficult task to convince them to do an 390 release.

> Granted, I'm not up to speed yet, but I thought a
> distribution of Linux
> was
> just that regardless of the platform, and the the application
> would run
> anywhere that distribution ran(i.e. binary compatible).

Within a processor architecture, that's usually true (modulo some
stupidity about where certain files are located, which is getting
better).  Across architectures, well... that's a different story. It's
more an issue of where the vendors are prepared to handle support. Intel
PC weenies are a dime a dozen; S390 literate people are more expensive
and a lot rarer, which raises the support cost, and most vendors don't
release a product they can't support.

It's Economics 101 -- most bang for the porting buck first, other stuff
comes later. Note that even IBM can't muscle their software divisions to
getting stuff to 390 Linux w/o making the support dollar case (cf the
long delays for TSM, Domino, etc).

-- db

Reply via email to