Hello from Gregg C Levine
It seems I've gone and done it again. Fast work, Jon Doyle, on putting
that together.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."� Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Jon R. Doyle
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Another distribution question
> 
> We do certifiy through normal QA process SuSE SLES, RH Adv Srv for
example
> on Intel systems, and SuSE SLES on zSeries, this is the commercial
> products, and I mention this because the thread started about Oracle
from
> what I read. Oracle has several levels from what I remember, one
called
> Validation like here:
> 
>
http://www.suse.com/en/business/certifications/certified_software/oracle
/certified.ht
> ml
> 
> SAP has something similar to the above, I even rememebr one tech doc
> telling you to put a SuSE Kernel on top of a Redhat install to be
> certified.
> 
> Most ISVs IMHO need to protect themselves somewhat on Linux because it
is
> a platform that can have any level of changes applied at the end-user
> level. Meaning, we know what Solaris level or NT level works through
QA
> processes, but what if somebody calls me and says I am running SuSE
SLES
> with 2.4.18, but I find they have patched the kernel with pre-emptive
> stuff, or any number of things that seemed interesting in the dev
> community, or say new glibc, and now Sendmail filters or something are
not
> working correctly. So you see we have to pick certain levels of the
> platform and QA that and call it "known to work". You find an issue,
we
> can reproduct that internally on the same platform, much more
reasonable
> to keep quality control.
> 
> Most HW vendors also certify against known version levels too,
obviously
> for driver sakes, in fact I have heard rumour once that Compaq did
more QA
> of Linux for that very reason than the Linux vendor themselves.
> 
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/linux/hpLinuxcert-dl.html
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jon
> 
> Jon R. Doyle
> Sendmail Inc.
> 6425 Christie Ave
> Emeryville, Ca. 94608
> 
> 
>                    (o_
>        (o_   (o_   //\
>        (/)_  (\)_  V_/_
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Gregg C Levine wrote:
> 
> > Hello from Gregg C Levine
> > Something else we need to consider here. Why would each distributor
> > actually distribute the freely available version of say, sendmail,
and
> > not insist on certification for it? John, if it wasn't certified
then,
> > it sure as taxes is now.
> > -------------------
> > Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > "The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
> > "Use the Force, Luke."� Obi-Wan Kenobi
> > (This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
> > (This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of
> > > John Summerfield
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:10 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Another distribution question
> > >
> > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Dave Jousma wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks all for the responses.  For us, this is a chicken and egg
> > thing.
> > > > We are just testing the waters, so to speak, so we are not ready
to
> > > > call any vendor(s) to see if they will play in the 390
environment.
> > > > You have answered my question, though.  The 3rd party app must
> > > > specify z/series or S390 as a platform, and if not, then it is
not
> > > > compatible(at this time).
> > >
> > > I know some folk value certification, but I wonder. Some time ago
a
> > > local business would not run Oracle on Linux "because it's not
> > > certified."
> > >
> > > It was actually available and it ran fine.
> > >
> > > Take a look at the software you run:
> > >         Is Samba certified?
> > >         Is Sendmail/Postfix/Exim?
> > >
> > > So far as I know, _none_ of the hardware I run Linux on is
certified.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > John.
> > >
> > > Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
> > > http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb
> >

Reply via email to