On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:29, Lucius, Leland wrote: > Oh, oh. I hope I didn't start something with this. What I really should > have said was... > > I haven't even tried submitting it to (who???) the original developers of > zipl. > > I would not have even hesitated had this been for the Intel world. But, > this is BIG business kinda stuff and, quite honestly, I don't know if it > would be up to the quality standards required for such a beast.
Most of us care more about the x86 stuff being correct. If one in 10,000 users hits a bug its a problem on x86, but might never happen on 390 8)
