On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:47:38AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> > Instruction sets, integer formats, address formats, addressing modes all
> > conspire against you.
> > Mosix and openmosix are only usable on machines with the same
> > architecture.
> >
> > Conceivably you could use either on S/390, but all members of the
> > cluster would have to be S/390 (or zBoxes pretending to be S/390).
> >
>
> Is a Hercules node good enough?

It will do the job, yes. For this purpose it's a zBox or S/390
(configuration choice).

You'd have to be pretty keen on the S/390 instruction set though.
Earlier, I posted a little Perl and showed how long it took an a real
Athlon.

Here's the time for the same thing on my Herculean zBox:
skink:~# time /usr/local/bin/bm.perl

real    257m49.513s
user    61m38.330s
sys     194m51.510s
skink:~#



>
> * CPU: what is the effective CPU speed of such a node on a
>        not-too-expensive computer?
>
> * Netork: The "speed" (both bandwidth and latency) between a linux
>   instance on the PC running Hercules and the linux instance on the
>   server

Here's a very rough measure:
skink:~# ping -c4 192.168.1.101
PING 192.168.1.101 (192.168.1.101): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.101: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=1.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=1.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=1.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.101: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=1.4 ms

--- 192.168.1.101 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 1.4/1.4/1.7 ms
skink:~# ifconfig ctc0
ctc0      Link encap:Serial Line IP
          inet addr:192.168.1.120  P-t-P:192.168.1.101
Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP  MTU:32760  Metric:1
          RX packets:772 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:659 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
          RX bytes:60145 (58.7 KiB)  TX bytes:66495 (64.9 KiB)

skink:~#




>
> Is it worth the effort of porting mosix to linux/s390 and develping a
> good scheduler?

Not from my POV. If I want to do real computing on my budget, there's no
competition for a cheap PC.

>
> --
> Tzafrir Cohen                       +---------------------------+
> http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/ |vim is a mutt's best friend|
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]       +---------------------------+
>

--


Cheers
John.

Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb

Reply via email to