I would love to see someone do a compare on BSD vs what SCO has now
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Fargusson.Alan" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | tb.ca.gov> |
| | Sent by: Linux on|
| | 390 Port |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | IST.EDU> |
| | |
| | |
| | 06/19/2003 01:53 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | Linux on 390 Port|
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Contrarian article
|
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I don't know for sure, but I suspect that SCO has access to the source for
all Unix variants. I think this is part of the System V license.
When we did a port from System V we had to give AT&T our source, and they
diffed it with their copy. They even made us undo one change.
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Schaffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Contrarian article
Alan writes:
> ...
>Note that SCO has stated that Solaris is clean.
How can they possibly know? Or do they have access to the Solaris
source?
--henry schaffer
