Just looked over it now. Very very nice, I think I'll make good use of it, thank you.
It's funny, Unix people say (think it was Kernighan or Ritchie who said it first) that this is a spartan operating system, that commands, directory, variable names are supposed to be short and concise (thus the vowel shortage abundance :) ), but I discovered mainframe hackers' code (be it my MVS colleague's JCL or the shell code you submitted) is a lot more spartan when it comes to designating objects. Makes sense. You mainframe guys were already doing this way before I was even born, when assembly was high-level and every bit count. Guess you are the original hackers :) -- jmc On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:23:52 -0500 "Lucius, Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here ya go. It is a tarball since it includes the required patch to the > dialog package. > > Glad you asked for it...Enjoy! > > Leland > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Samy Rengasamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:14 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: An update to the little script I post the other day... > > > > > > Can you post the updated script, Please. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Samy Rengasamy. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lucius, Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:49 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: An update to the little script I post the other day... > > > > > > If anyone is interested, I've updated that script I posted > > the other day > > that allows you to edit MVS PDSes from Linux. It now > > supports z/VM as well > > and provides improved handling of large directory lists. > > (The first one > > basically sucked for large lists.) > > > > Unfortunately, it requires a patch to the "dialog" package to > > get around > > command line length limitations. I won't be posting it unless there's > > interest. > > > > Leland > > > >
