On Tuesday 05 August 2003 06:32, John Summerfield wrote:
> This is not a count of how many are using which, and it doesn't include
> all email clinets (Pine doesn't insert this header, and I don't see
> kmail).
kmail, mozilla and mutt all use 'User-Agent:' instead of 'X-Mailer:'.
Here are the numbers for the last 30 days:
18 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
7 User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
5 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4)
4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
2 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
2 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021204
2 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021203
2 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208
2 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823
2 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212
2 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1)
2 User-Agent: KMail/1.5
1 User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120
1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; pt-BR; rv:1.0.1)
1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4)
1 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
1 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1
> I note one reactionary using OS/2;-) (surely there's only one).
What's more puzzling to me is that there is no evidence of anyone using a
linux-390 based mail client. Is anyone running mutt or pine on s390?
Arnd <><
