It was ro. -----Original Message----- From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:08, Fargusson.Alan wrote: > Sharing /usr doesn't work as well as you might like. > We did this at Sun with diskless workstations. > It turns out that the server gets saturated with only a few workstations. > I think that about 10 workstations per server was the maximum. Uh, I've shared /usr ro between many more than that Linux/390 images. I suspect that the limitation in the Sun case is that you were doing NFS and the server was having to broker a bunch of requests. Was it ro or rw? Adam
