We initially took SuSE in-house because Oracle only supported their environment. It's become standard for us now.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Jarboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Any new SuSE vs RedHat arguments? > > > Management here is getting serious about a support contract > for linux on > the mainframe, and asked me to poll reasons why > people/organizations may > have chosen one distro over the other on s/390 (specifically RedHat vs > SuSE). In the archives most of the arguments in favor of > redhat revolve > around: free download, familiarity with the environment, management > pressure to keep linux to 1 distro in house. SuSE arguments typically > revolve around: first on s/390, work more closely with s/390 > community, > and GA SuSE at more current patch-levels than RH (particularly where > s/390 or VM is concerned). Are there other considerations people have > discovered, or any of the above I mentioned that seem off-base? > > Thanks for any input, > ~ Daniel > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > > This message is the property of Time Inc. or its affiliates. It may be > legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only > for the use > of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or > otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would > allow it to be > viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the > reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, > distribution, > copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information > herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication > in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete > this message. > Thank you. >
