Dans un message du 19 Sep ` 12:40, Chris Cox icrivait :
> >Come on :) , it is trivial to get one package with the utils for
> >something as common...
> >
> >I really have no preference for any for Redhat or SuSE, but you're
> >being a bit unfair.
> Actually, not unfair at all.
Well, I was refering to the whole message not to this particular issue.
> outside of support, corporate customers are not likely to install
> packages outside of the vendor's support. Just adding reiserfs to RH
> is not as simple as pulling (potentially non vendor supported)
> packages off the web.
I agree that adding a big software package outside vendor supports is a
burden. But Unix fs are actually quite integrated. Unless I am mistaken,
adding a fs is basically adding support in the kernel (which should be
already for reiserfs there since mounting is supported) and then
installing the tools (mkfs.reiser, fsck.reiser etc.)
So I think that this difference is really not an big issue. Of course,
if this is the only one, it becomes the biggest.
> I prefer the player who's motiviation is strong regardless of the
> number $$$'s presented to him/her.... but many (if not most) people
> base decisions on a company's financial data.
You like Debian then :-)
Guillaume.
--
Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What is the point of trying to dream anymore ? (Alanis Morisette)
