Thanks, I don't want to put UML on zSeries but I want to prove that z/VM is the best choice ...
Again it's difficult for me to prove this because i don't master UML anyway
...
Regards,
Vallet Fabrice
PSA Peugeot Citro�n
Direction des Syst�mes d'Information
Service INSI/ETSO/MVS
Site de Poissy - CTI d'Ach�res
T�l. 01 30 19 21 79 (29)
Richard Troth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc :
Envoy� par : Objet : Re: UML or Linux on z/VM
Linux on 390
Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARIST.EDU>
25/09/2003
18:16
Veuillez
r�pondre �
Linux on 390
Port
Dunno if UML has been "ported" to zSeries or not.
That would clinch it. Most of us feel the same as you do.
Personally, UML is a great project. But z/VM offers things that
are significant in the most positive ways, things that UML
just cannot do, even if it has been ported: hypersockets,
non-Linux guest interaction, hypervisor interaction (CP commands).
So handle it delicately.
Tell your UML afficionado that UML is a good thing
but that z/VM offers different qualities of service from UML.
Others have tried to document the advantages of z/VM.
You would have to weight those lists agains the UML feature set
and elimiate overlap for a better UML -vs- VM comparison.
-- R;
