Good comment Alan...
One more thing, the purported purpose of bogomips is for
capacity planning and choice of processor for a workload.  Under
VM, bogomips are really BOGUSMIPS, and are so unreliable
(bogus), it can only lead to bogus business decisions.

In the Domino redbook residency in August, there was
an "unbeliever" using "top" to look at processor utilization
of top under linux under VM.
I and another engineer in a different office was able to
control his perspective - top's perspective (linux's perspective)
on the processor requirement to run top. Before we started
playing, top was showing it was using 8%. which was close.
It turns out that in a controled environment, we found how
to pick a target utilization for top - meaning that we decided
we wanted top to report it was using 30% - and made it happen.
top was still using 8%, but was reporting over 30%. That was
in a controled environment. (ESALPS reported top as using
8%). You can't trust CPU numbers reported by linux when under VM
at all. This is VERY easy to prove. It will get worse in an
uncontrolled environment. Oh, we're having fun now....

>From: Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Tuesday, 10/28/2003 at 08:57 PST, Jim Sibley
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> mp2000 - less than 200 bogomips
>> 9672-zz7 (g6) 630 bogomips
>> 2064-116 (z1) 820 bogomips
>> 2084-b16 (Trexx GA1) 2400 bogomips!
>>
>> The speed of the top of the line zSeries has increased
>> at four fold in the last 3-4 years.
>>
>> It seems that the literature is lagging what is now
>> available in the field. Is zSeries more competitive
>> now  against other platforms than it was four years
>> ago?
>
>Why should anyone give a rats behind about bogomips numbers?  A
>four-fold increase in bogomips says only that bogomips runs 4
>times as fast as it used to.
>
>Your question about comparisons of competitiveness is
>interesting, but not in the context of bogomips.  I would ask if
>TCO has improved in the last 3-4 years.  The CPU selection is, of
>course, only one variable in the equation.
>
>Alan Altmark
>Sr. Software Engineer
>IBM z/VM Development







"If you can't measure it, I'm Just NOT interested!"(tm)

/************************************************************/
Barton Robinson - CBW     Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Velocity Software, Inc    Mailing Address:
 196-D Castro Street       P.O. Box 390640
 Mountain View, CA 94041   Mountain View, CA 94039-0640

VM Performance Hotline:   650-964-8867
Fax: 650-964-9012         Web Page:  WWW.VELOCITY-SOFTWARE.COM
/************************************************************/

Reply via email to