SCO sues Novell over Unix rights
(http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040120/tech_sco_novell_1.html).
SEATTLE, Jan 20 (Reuters) - SCO Group Inc. (NasdaqSC:SCOX
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=scox> - News
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=scox>) sued Novell Inc. (NasdaqNM:NOVL
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=novl> - News
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=novl>) on Tuesday, saying the business
software maker was blocking its efforts to collect licensing fees from
users of Linux, the freely available operating system.

SCO, which claims control over the rights to the Unix software system,
charges that some parts of Unix are being used illegally in Linux, the
operating system that can be copied and modified freely.

SCO sued International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ibm> - News
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q/h?s=ibm>) last year, saying the world's
largest computer company was responsible for infringing on its
copyrights by promoting Linux software containing Unix code.

Novell and SCO, both based in Utah, have been arguing intermittently
over which company controls the copyright to Unix.

SCO is demanding that users of Linux, which include large corporations,
academic institutions and government agencies, pay a licensing fee or
face litigation.

SCO said in a statement that it filed suit against Novell for "its
alleged bad faith effort to interfere with SCO's rights with respect to
UNIX and UnixWare."

SCO said that Novell had improperly filed copyright registrations and
made misleading claims that it owned the rights to Unix.

Novell spokesman Bruce Lowry declined to comment on the specifics of the
lawsuit, but said, "We will be defending our interests."

A week ago, Novell announced a program to indemnify customers using its
Linux software, which it acquired through the $210 million acquisition
of German Linux developer SuSE Linux.

Dave Jones


"


--
Dave Jones                                        Sine Nomine Associates
Houston, TX                                       www.sinenomine.net
281.578.7544

Reply via email to