I wouldn't give those lawyers any credit for getting MS a free pass. MS lost the case on the facts, and their lawyers let them make fools of themselves - remember the rigged demo, and Gates' statement the "he " didn't mark a message 'high importance' - "the computer did". The decision was overturned on a 'procedural' error because Judge Jackson made public remarks about the case, and the appeal judge wasn't interested in any facts, just in letting MS off the hook.
Bill -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Cox Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SCO sues Novell Ryan Ware wrote: .. > > No, they have some of the best and some of the richest. I too think that > SCO may have an ace yet. > So... the best lawyers are the ones that let Microsoft get away with a simple hand slap for being a monopoly?? I don't think they have a clue. Just look at the stupid remarks that SCO keeps on making. Any reasonable lawyer would have gagged Darl by now.... nope... I don't believe any part of that except the "richest" part.
