[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We run one IFL and with the hz_timer=1 setting we get 100 hundred messages,
with hz_timer=0 we get 3-10 messages approx. each second.


You can do better. The trick is that you need 300 mS between ticks for
z/VM to see you're idle and pack up your things. One might believe that
this means more than 4 per second does not do it, but it turns out the
interrupts group together a bit and don't distribute evenly over time.
Have a look at the "Performance and Tuning" redbook for a method to
determine which process is getting the wakup calls and cut it down.

Rob

Reply via email to