Peter, what release of zOS are you on?

---SB


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 5:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
>
>
> I am using CTCs between my Linux LPAR and two z/OS V1.2
> LPARs. Using might not be the right word. These CTCs work
> great, and then they stop with no indication of any errors. I
> can no longer ping the Linux LPAR from the z/OS LPARs. I can
> still ping the z/OS LPARs from the Linux LPAR. The CTCs use
> static routes. It is driving me crazy! I am leaning on the
> z/OS side but if you find anything out, please post back
> here. If someone else has experienced this before, please let
> me know. Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> Steve Bui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 03/26/2004 12:56 AM
> Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
>
>
>         To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
>
>
> I'll work with the IBM support center on resolving it.  Thanks Mark.
>
> ---SB
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> > Post, Mark K
> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:43 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> >
> > Steve,
> >
> > I'm kind of at a loss here.  I don't really know what to
> suggest next.
> >
> > Is there some reason you want to use a CTC connection,
> specifically?
> > It might be a whole lot easier to give the Linux system a
> connection
> > to an OSA card, or CLAW device, or a real HiperSocket to
> talk between
> > the two systems.
> >
> >
> > Mark Post
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Steve Bui
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:47 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> >
> > No go on mtu of 32760.
> >
> > ---SB
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> > Post, Mark K
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:11 PM
> >
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, then try changing the Linux parameters to 32760. You
> could just
> > try
> >
> > doing it via an ifconfig command first, to see if that makes any
> > difference
> >
> > or not.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark Post
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> >
> > Steve Bui
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:48 PM
> >
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> >
> >
> > Both places (TCPIP profile on zOS and ifcfg-ctc0 on linux) already
> > have mtu
> >
> > of 1500 hardcoded.
> >
> > ---SB
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >
> > > Behalf Of Post, Mark K
> >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:23 PM
> >
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I would expect that to be the only two places needed. Are
> >
> > > you asking because one (or both) of them isn't reflecting
> > the change?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Mark Post
> >
> > >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:21 PM
> >
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I set both mtu to 1500 in zOS TCPIP and in ifcfg-ctc0.
> >
> > > Where else do you set it?
> >
> > > ---SB
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > > > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >
> > > Behalf Of
> >
> > > > Post, Mark K
> >
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 5:49 PM
> >
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Steve,
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > This caught my eye:
> >
> > > > ActMtu: 32760
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > The ifconfig output from your first note showed this:
> >
> > > > UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > The two values need to match.
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Mark Post
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > > > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >
> > > Behalf Of
> >
> > > > Steve Bui
> >
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:22 AM
> >
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > > Subject: Re: CTC between linux & zOS.
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > I tried both 0 or 1 with no success.
> >
> > > > Netstat dev on zOS shows:
> >
> > > > DevName: CTC3X7 DevType: CTC DevNum: 0B72
> >
> > > > DevStatus: Ready
> >
> > > > LnkName: CTC37 LnkType: CTC LnkStatus: Ready
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > NetNum: 1 QueSize: 0
> >
> > > > BytesIn: 0 BytesOut: 0
> >
> > > > ActMtu: 32760
> >
> > > > BSD Routing Parameters:
> >
> > > > MTU Size: 00000 Metric: 00
> >
> > > > DestAddr: 10.0.3.2 SubnetMask: 255.255.255.0
> >
> > > > Multicast Specific:
> >
> > > > Multicast Capability: Yes
> >
> > > > Group RefCnt
> >
> > > > ----- ------
> >
> > > > 224.0.0.1 0000000001
> >
> > > > -------------------------
> >
> > > > ---SB
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > On Monday, 03/22/2004 at 10:18 EST, "Post, Mark K"
> >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong (I haven't played with MVS TCPIP
> >
> > > definitions
> >
> > > > much),
> >
> > > > > but in this statement:
> >
> > > > > LINK CTC37 CTC 1 CTC3X7
> >
> > > > > doesn't the "1" say to swap the read channel with the write
> >
> > > > channel?
> >
> > > > > If
> >
> > > > so,
> >
> > > > > I would think that is your problem, since the entry in
> >
> > > chandev.conf
> >
> > > > > ctc0,0x0d33,0x0d32,0,3 says to do exactly the same thing.
> >
> > > The fact
> >
> > > > > that the ifconfig output
> >
> > > > you
> >
> > > > > show lists 5 errors, all of them "carrier" errors would
> >
> > > seem to bear
> >
> > > > this
> >
> > > > > out.
> >
> > > > Also use NETSTAT DEV (onetstat?) on the z/OS side to find
> >
> > > out what the
> >
> > > > status of the CTC. Alan Altmark Sr. Software Engineer IBM z/VM
> >
> > > > Development
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
> instructions, send
> > email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
> instructions, send
> > email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
> instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
> instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to