I'm not really a linux guy, so I can't tell you for sure...but on zVM I get
15:01:26 DTCOSD104E Primary routing node already defined when trying to define a guest as primary router on a shared osa where one is already defined. Regards, Miguel Diaz Staff Software Engineer TCP/IP for z/VM Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/19/2004 02:40:09 PM: > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:19:45PM -0400, Miguel Diaz wrote: > > One stack connected to the OSA can be designated as the primary_router. It > > doesn't matter if they are in seperate LPARS or guests in the same LPAR, > > only one, regardless of microcode level. If you need to have two stacks > > with primary_router specified, you need to OSA cards. Note that unless > > z/OS is actually acting as a virtual router, there's no need for it to > > specify primary_router. > > If I set primary_router in the Linux guest, and it appears to succeed, > has it succeeded, or will I get an error if I ask it to be the primary > router and someone else already is? > > Adam > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
