On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 10:46, James Melin wrote: > Ahh ok. That clarifies it, and my understanding of what we are going to do > leaves 2 CP's defined to VM and only one virtual CP defined to the guest, > with VM working out the details.
OK. If you get a chance, you might see what happens if you define a second virtual processor to the guest. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
