Ulrich, Talk about good timing. I normally do build that way. As it turns out, it fails miserably in this case. As my other note says, doing it the wrong way still generates errors. I've never trusted bison-generated source code, and this is why.
Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulrich Weigand Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 4:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Progress on PL/1 for Linux Mark Post wrote: >./configure >make Note that building in the source directory has been known to not work reliably for the GCC tree. In fact, there even have been discussions to officially declare this unsupported ... I'd recommend to build in a different object directory, just to avoid potential problems (and it's a good idea in general, anyway). Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
