<quote> "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix," he added </quote>
What a maroon! How can people spout such misinformation (lies!!!). And why does the "press" even bother with them? http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;97798672;fp;2;fpid;1 Another flash! Running a single Windows 2003 Server edition on a dual 900Mhz Xenon box costs less than running Linux on a z900! http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/26/microsoft_advertising/ <quote> The advert says that independent research from Meta group found Linux cost ten times as much to run as its windows equivalent. It said: "The results showed that IBM z900 mainframe running Linux is much less capable and vastly more expensive than Windows Server 2003 as a platform for server consolidation." ... The Meta study compared the cost of Linux, running on IBM's z900 mainframe, to a Windows Server 2003 image, running on 900 MHz Intel Xeon CPUs. The ASA concluded that it was "a comparison that demonstrated the price and performance between IBM zSeries hardware and Intel Xeon CPUs". </quote> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
