> We are preparing to move our TSM server off z/OS. We would > not be doing > this if we just needed to pay for more standard engine > processors to keep > TSM where it is. Most of the non-IBM software products we > have running under > z/OS have license charges based on the total processor > capacity that is used > or could be used to run z/OS. The license upgrades triggered by adding > standard engines would cost us more than the engines. This is what is > driving the TSM server migration.
Sure be nice if Tivoli offered a viable option on IFLs, wouldn't it? The Bacula option is looking better every day. Some minor tweaks to the storage server piece, and it seems to work beautifully with the NFS option. Now to get a native storage server on USS and VM.... -- db ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
