The ability to clone servers using mainframe dasd features such as STK
snapshot, IBM Flashcopy(?) or even just good old DDR is another advantage of
the maniframe. You don't have to re-do the installs and patches. Cloning
takes less time and you know the servers are exactly the same. Just need
reconfiguration for IP address,etc.

Another potential advantage is saving money on network switches - but only
if you move a lot of servers to the mainframe.


---Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Richard Troth
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux Questions


Cameron ...

You need to look at the total picture:  memory footprint
(of the applications,  and then of the "systems"),  CPU usage
(again of the apps and then op sys),  I/O (again: scale it).
If there is a lot of I/O to perform,  or a lot of memory needed,
zSeries (and z/VM) is probably a better fit.   If you need to do
a lot of computation,  go for INTeL (or its clones).

> Having troubles with promotion of Linux for zSeries in corporate
> environment. I'm Hopeing someone here can point me to some good
> documents on the strengths against an intel platform running VMWARE.

Personally,  I don't know where such documents are.
(Maybe a Google search?  Or someone who knows might chime in.)
But the underlying hardware  (zSeries -vs- INTeL, and their
plug-compatible work-alikes)  is so very different.   Be aware.

The mainframe is a  "data mover".   It has been tuned over the years
to deal with tremendous volumes of data.   The PC-class processor has
been tuned for PC-class workloads.   It is the better number cruncer
because PC-class jobs use a LOT of processor power for all that
interactive and display work.

On virtualization  (a grossly misused term now in the industry,
but hopefully in this context we all understand),  the mainframe has
a great advantage.   Doing virtual machines on PC-class processors is
hard work.   Not all guest operating systems are supported by VMware.
(To note:  ye olde OS/2.)   And you cannot run VMware-on-VMware,
but whether that is an artificial restriction or a real one,
I don't know,  and either way,  there is a performance question.

Don't get me wrong:  I am very impressed with what VMware has done.
And I'm not ragging on INTeL for its design.   Just that the INTeL
design does not lend itself to "self virtualization".

> There have
> been Questions come up about performance, Oracle, How many guests can we
> put out there and what kind of performance loss per guest do we get or
> can we expect? Just want to justify in spending a quarter of a million on
> the hardware and be able to get what we need out of it. Does anyone know
> of some good docs pointing to these answered questions.

There are lots and lots of performance issues with running
multiple copies of anything.   Guest operating systems present a
pathological case:  they're demanding.   I'm a big believer in zSeries
and especially z/VM.   But most of us on the list will tell you
it will not solve all your problems.   (Nor will VMware.)

As recently as two years ago,  VMware did not advertise more than
a half dozen virtual machines on any single physical processor.
It may be different for ESX than for GSX (or certainly "Workstation").
By contrast,  z/VM WILL RELIABLY RUN dozens, hundreds, or even
several thousand guest operating systems simultaneously.

> -Cameron

I hope this helps.
Simplistically:  z/VM wins where the guest systems will have
a large memory footprint or will be doing a lot of I/O,
or where you need many.   VMware wins where you only need a few
and you need the numeric capabilities of the PC-class processor
or if you are  "starting cheap".

-- R;
HCPMCV1459E

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to