Just to stick my 2 cents in, a while back I posted a patch to the "halt" script that basically eliminates this whole problem by performing "hcp logoff" at the end of the shutdown process. We used that successfully for some time after being unable to get this mechanism to work satisfactorily.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Tobias Doerkes > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 1:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Problems using SIGNAL SHUTDOWN > > > Hi all, > > i know that the vmpoff=LOGOFF is not relevant for poweroff , > but there was a > suggestion to give it a try. And so i tried. > > But to answer the question regarding the patch: No, i did not > try the patch, > because we are running a test and do not have the possibility > to retrieve an > update (we are using SuSE). I have to wait until my shop signs the > service-contract. But i ran a test using just one virtual cpu > and it doesn't > work either ... > > Regards, > Tobias Dvrkes > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO > LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
