Well, if you don't speak, you can end up staying ignorant.  That is why
I speak a lot<G>.

In the Sles9 31 vs 64 bit question.

I have yet to find anything during installation that asks whether I'm
31 bit for 64 bit.  In fact, I've not found any documentation that
discusses this fact.

So, my assumption, based on real hardware on other platforms, that if
you install Sles9 on a 64 bit VM user, it installs Sles9 as 64 bit.  If
you have a 31 bit user, it installs as 31 bit.  But I haven't seen any
documentation on how a decision is made during Sles9 installation.

So, immediately, is would seem that I have to define and maintain two
different Sles9 images for cloning purposes, and then keep, who is what
straight.

The Oracle 10g database servers have to be 64 bit, but I don't know
what other servers we have that could use either 64 bit for the software
that only runs on 64 bit.

But from some other comments I've received, it seems I do have to keep
the two flavors of Sles9.  Some application only run in 64 bit.  Some
applications only run in 31 bit.  Most run in either/or.

I was just wondering, in general, 31 bit vs 64 bit performance and
resource utilization as well as what doesn't work well on one flavor vs
another.

In any case, currently we have VCTCA and IUCV connections for Linux
running on z/VM 4.2.  With z/VM 5.1 and z/890 (with OSA) our
communications will be revamped to v/Switch and virtual LAN per prior
discussions.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/30/05 11:52 AM >>>
Showing my ignorance, but the logic I use is that 31bit apps can run
in
either a 31 bit OS or a 64 bit OS.  Unless the application is doing
something specific and detecting that it has reached the 31 bit line,
do you
really have to worry?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to