I would definitely agree with Tom (on most issues).  Unless you have some
HUGE application on Linux that may consume multiple engines, such as Oracle
or SAP, z/VM is THE way to go.  There are all the System Management issues
that z/VM can do (roll-out, Q/A, Backup, D/R).  There are the Resource
Sharing Opportunities (CPs, Memory, Tape, ATLs, Networks, etc.). There are
the potential $$$ to be saved.  Cloning Linux Environments is much quicker.
The entire Environment is greatly simplified.  There are other Product
Suites to consider if you want to have your z/VM and z/Linux worlds mesh
with your z/OS world.

Another Disclaimer:  I am a z/Bigot (z/OS, z/VM, z/Linux)

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 SYSN 12:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LPAR only Linux

In some ways, running VM on the IFL can be considered a cost savings.

First the costs:

z/VM 5.1 is $25K one time charge (list price...your business partner may
charge less).  Then about $5,600 per year, starting in the first year
for maintenance.

4-6 disk packs (3390-3)

20MB or so for real memory.
Takes a small amount of support (can easily contract it out if necessary).

Now for the savings...

Each LPAR takes some real memory.  With VM you only need one LPAR.
If one Linux image isn't being used, under VM the memory can be used by
other images.  With LPAR, well, without an IPL, the memory sits there
idle ($80K per 8 GB for memory....big cost savings).

If you have a Shark type dasd, then disk sizes can be any size you want.
  VM can do this with any type of disk device with minidisks.  So if you
only need 200 MB for a Linux swap disk, you don't have to dedicate an
entire volume if you can't create a 200 MB disk.

With VM, you get vdisk support (Take that!...LPAR)  Create the swap disk
in memory.  Doesn't take any space unless it is used and then it is the
fastest thing alive.

If you have FlashCopy, without VM, you have problems using the duplicate
volumes without creating another LPAR and backing things up there.  With
VM, there are better or I should say easier ways to handle duplicate
volumes.

Tape drive sharing in VM is a breeze.  With LPAR, it can be done, but it
seems to me to be harder.

The more Linux images you want, the more you need VM.

Linux test systems?  Easy in VM.
Linux development systems?  Easy in VM.
Dedicated Linux images for certain workloads?  Easy in VM.  And easier
to tune and define priorities.

Central console management is easy in VM (doesn't require chargeable
software, just use PROP).  Console automation also.

Speaking of performance, performance tools, such as from Velocity
Software, can be well worth the price.  Nothing similar for a Linux on
multiple LPAR shops.

This may be just wishful thinking, but the z/890 that was just delivered
to us this past week...I expect the run the IFL side, with multiple
Linux images, totally "lights out".  Of course this is with a Shark 800
and and IBM VTS for tape.

Disclaimer...
I'm a VM bigot for the last 30 or so years.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are upgrading our system to a z890 (and getting a new HMC) which is now
> installed and running on the old hardware a z800.  I see a new feature
> (Integrated Ascii Console) and I have been searching for a redpaper or
> existing e-mail archives from this list on how to cofigure so I can use
this
> console to work with Linux instead of the horrible existing HMC single
line
> mode interface.  Can someone point me to documentation or some
instructions
> about how to get this interface to work.  Now when I click on the icon on
> the HMC I just gat a blank window with no text and I cannont type anything
> into it.
>
> TIA -- by the time I get any responses (and assuming things go well) I
will
> be running Linux on a 890 box - still without VM.  The IBM rep here just
> told me that VM to manage Linux only (running on our single IFL) is
> reasonable.  Can someone confirm that.  We are (like most companies)
trying
> to keep costs down and avoid being "outsourced".
>
> Doug
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to