Thanks. That is why I'm trying to lean towards a full WAS license. Since IBM HATS and GEAC's web interface use it.
The free for all, is my fault. The IFL was initially for Oracle database consolidation only. I stated I didn't want Java on the system as that could blow our ROI. Then, on HATS, I somewhat backed down and said that, sure we could install it on the mainframe, do our testing, perhaps, depending on its resource requirement, leave it on the mainframe. But I can bring it up, much, much quicker, with "free" mainframe hardware, when we could if we have to "buy" the servers. The mainframe being free, until the application goes into production. Then the resources need to be committed (purchased). So, I have a load of lightly utilized systems projected being installed on the IFL. Once up and running, perhaps adding IFLs becomes a better proposition than buying servers. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting
Your app developers wrote to one rather than the other. Is all this really projected to run on a single engine? Because ain't none of 'em really lightweight. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
