I agree. There are many ways of providing excellent HA solutions for linux guest on z/VM, including redundant servers, sharing methods, heartbeats, etc. Recall an earlier post about convincing the customers do go with clustered solutions - as long as profit were there. The solutions already exist. So I would architect a linux based HA solution.
Not that these heavy weight additions to CP wouldn't be fun and cool. David David Boyes wrote:
Umm, not to be a pest, but aren't we kind of over-engineering here? Coupled with LVM or EVMS snapshots, there are good in-guest backup utilities easily available that make this problem trivially disappear, and you get file-level backup and restore as a freebie. Do we really need to teach CP the innards of various guests and break the virtualization model to do so? I don't' think so. If you need that kind of HA, you need to set up the system to support it, eg using a storage virtualization layer like LVM2 or EVMS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
