I agree with all the NFS comments... But...
But the customer's goal is to reduce MVS (oops, sorry, z/OS) cycles. He
uses FTP today to move the file from MVS to *IX. While NFS is a choice,
I doubt that it would save a significant amount of MVS overhead compared
to the FTP transfer.
Thanks,
Lee
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Wednesday, 10/04/2006 at 01:49 CST, Lee Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From Linux on z, can I read a z/OS flat file (DSORG=PS) on a pack where
I have read access to that DASD volume?
What about multiple extents across multiple volumes? (It's a 50gig
file.)
No.
This is what NFS is for and it makes all the nasty problems introduced by
snooping on MVS disks go away.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
--
Lee Stewart, Senior SE
Sirius Enterprise Systems Group
Phone: (303) 798-2954
Fax: (720) 228-2321
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.siriuscom.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
