Absolutely f*****g agreed. -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Boyes Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 1:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH 50/59] sysctl: Move utsname sysctls to their own file
Could you guys take this discussion back to LKML, please? I don't think it's directly relevant to Linux on S/390 any longer, and few (if any) people there really want this level of detail. Also, in the future, it'd be polite to ask before cross-posting this volume of stuff to other lists... -- db. > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric > W. Biederman > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 3:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 50/59] sysctl: Move utsname sysctls to their own file ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
