We are trying to decide which 3390 model to configure in our incoming storage device (probably emc but could be shark). The point of interest is which model provides the least amount of 'wasted' space due to overhead requirements. Here is a chart that I've cobled together from a few web sites and you'll notice that the usable bytes column is empty.
Disk Type Data cylinders Tracks per cylinder Bytes per track Bytes per cylinder Bytes per module GB per module Spare Cylinders Usable Bytes 3390-1 1113 15 56,664 849,960 946,005,480 0.95 1 3390-2 2226 15 56,664 849,960 1,892,010,960 1.89 1 3390-3 3339 15 56,664 849,960 2,838,016,440 2.84 1 3390-9 10017 15 56,664 849,960 8,514,049,320 8.51 3 3390-27 32760 15 56,664 849,960 27,844,689,600 27.84 3 3390-54 65520 15 56,664 982,800 55,689,379,200 55.69 3 Thanks Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering Services (CAPES) 925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our passion is service. We?re here to make lives better.? ?Never attribute to malice what can be caused by miscommunication.? NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
