Not really. MapFS isn't a distributed or cluster file system. It's basically Union FS as produced by Levanta for their management appliance back in 2005. According to the Source Forge CVS stats, there haven't really been many (2?) commits since Nate Stahl initially created the SF project for it back when it was announced.
For the glass-is-half-full crowd, I guess that mean it was almost perfect right out of the gate... ;-) ks On 5/15/07, Lionel B. Dyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would MapFS make sense in this case? http://sourceforge.net/projects/mapfs
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
