Well, we've used in in their product across 140 servers for quite some time. I think we've reported 1 bug (and they already had a fix) in mapfs. So, glass is pretty full here.
Someone really ought to pick this up and do something with it --- good stuff... Saves lots of disks... Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Smith Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:30 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Cluster File System for HA Not really. MapFS isn't a distributed or cluster file system. It's basically Union FS as produced by Levanta for their management appliance back in 2005. According to the Source Forge CVS stats, there haven't really been many (2?) commits since Nate Stahl initially created the SF project for it back when it was announced. For the glass-is-half-full crowd, I guess that mean it was almost perfect right out of the gate... ;-) ks On 5/15/07, Lionel B. Dyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would MapFS make sense in this case? > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mapfs > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature